12 August 2026
The future of the NHS will not be determined only by what happens in hospitals. It will be shaped by what happens long before people need them.
For more than a decade, a consistent argument has run through British public service reform: Health is not created in hospitals alone. It has been made from the Treasury bench, from town halls and increasingly from Downing Street itself, most recently by Andy Burnham, who has long argued that social care, housing and community resilience are forms of prevention in their own right.
That argument rests on a simple observation: The factors that determine whether someone lives a healthy, happy and productive life are shaped overwhelmingly outside the walls of the NHS.
Health is influenced by whether someone lives in a warm, safe home. It is shaped by secure employment, financial stability, social connection, education and access to support when life becomes difficult – in other words, by the conditions people experience long before they join a waiting list, attend an outpatient appointment or arrive at an emergency department.
If we genuinely believe this, the implications are profound. Britain’s greatest public service challenge is not simply how to integrate health and social care more effectively. It is how to create a prevention-first society.
The next frontier is coordination, not integration
For years, policymakers have discussed the integration of health and social care. Important progress has been made, but the ambition may now be too narrow. Health and care are only part of the picture. The wider determinants of health include housing, income, education, work, social connection and access to timely support.
Consider the following examples:
-
A child living in temporary accommodation
-
An older person experiencing loneliness
-
A family struggling with debt
-
A tenant living in damp housing
-
A vulnerable resident navigating complex benefits processes
-
A working-age adult unable to access mental health support.
These are not purely healthcare problems. Nor are they exclusively housing, welfare or local government problems. They are human problems, yet public services remain organised around institutions rather than people.
A citizen’s experience is often fragmented by organisational ownership, functional responsibility and service boundaries. Each organisation may be trying to do the right thing, but collectively the system often responds only after vulnerability becomes visible.
Different organisations see different signals:
-
A housing provider sees rent arrears
-
A council sees a benefits application
-
A community service sees social isolation
-
A GP sees deteriorating health
-
A hospital sees an admission.
The citizen experiences one life. The system experiences multiple disconnected events.
“That disconnect is one of the most expensive inefficiencies in modern public services – not because organisations are failing, but because they were designed for a world in which information moved slowly, services operated independently and prevention was difficult to coordinate. The world has changed. The operating model has not.”
John Clarke
Head of Client Solutions – Health, Netcall
We have automated the twentieth century
The last twenty years have seen enormous investment in digital transformation across public services. We have digitised forms, built portals, introduced virtual assistants, automated processes and modernised contact centres. Each of these achievements matters.
Yet digital transformation has too often focused on making existing organisational processes faster, rather than redesigning services around people and outcomes. The result is that many organisations have successfully transformed themselves, while the citizen journey remains fundamentally unchanged.
A person may still move between organisations, repeat the same information, navigate institutional structures and become another referral in a complex system. Technology has improved transactions, but it has not always transformed experiences.
In many ways, we have automated twentieth-century service models. The challenge now is to build twenty-first-century ones.
The prevention platform
What would a public service system designed around prevention actually look like?
It would resemble what could be described as a ‘prevention platform’: Not a single technology, not a national database and not simply another transformation programme, but a new way of orchestrating services around people. In this model:
-
Risk factors are identified earlier
-
Information is connected intelligently
-
Organisations share workflows rather than referrals
-
Citizens experience a joined-up journey
-
Professionals are supported by automation and insight
-
Intervention occurs before crisis emerges.
Consider a tenant reporting recurring damp and mould. Today, the issue might remain within a housing management process. In a prevention platform model, the same interaction could identify respiratory risk factors, coordinate activity across housing and health services, trigger wellbeing outreach and support intervention before a hospital admission becomes necessary.
Now consider an older resident repeatedly contacting multiple agencies. Rather than treating each interaction as unrelated, technology could identify indicators of social isolation, vulnerability or declining independence, then coordinate support before emergency intervention is required.
The same principle applies to financial hardship. Benefits challenges could be identified and addressed before they become severe enough to affect health, housing stability or family wellbeing.
These are not futuristic aspirations. They are achievable. The harder question is not whether the technology exists, but whether organisations are willing and resourced to redesign around it – shared data governance, funding models and accountability structures all have to move together, not just the tooling.
Greater Manchester showed an early direction of travel
Greater Manchester has long been viewed as one of the UK’s most ambitious environments for public service reform. Its devolution journey, and the Live Well approach that grew out of it, demonstrated something the rest of the country is increasingly recognising: Better outcomes emerge when services collaborate around citizens rather than organisational structures.
At its core, that model was never simply about integrating health services. It recognised that health and wellbeing are inseparable from housing, employment, education, communities and opportunity. Its belief was straightforward: People should not have to reach crisis before the state becomes visible. Public services should set people up for success, rather than intervene only after failure.
That principle is now finding a national audience. As Prime Minister, Andy Burnham has placed prevention at the centre of the national conversation – the latest, and most prominent, voice in a debate that has been building across local government and the NHS for years. The idea’s staying power lies in the fact that it has outlasted several governments and administrations already; it is not the property of any one leader or party.
That principle should now guide technology investment too, because digital transformation should not merely reduce cost. It should increase human potential.
Technology is finally catching up with the prevention agenda
For many years, prevention was more aspiration than reality. Leaders understood its importance but lacked the tools to operationalise it at scale. That is changing.
The emergence of agentic AI, intelligent automation, workflow orchestration and modern digital engagement creates new possibilities for public services. The significance is often misunderstood: The real value of AI is not simply that it can answer questions, but that it can help coordinate action.
When combined with workflow automation and case management, intelligent systems can:
-
Understand intent
-
Surface relevant information
-
Identify risk indicators
-
Trigger actions
-
Coordinate multiple teams
-
Maintain continuity across organisational boundaries.
This moves technology beyond efficiency and positions it as an enabler of prevention.
Importantly, this is not about replacing people. The future of public services will remain profoundly human.
-
Social workers will still need empathy
-
Clinicians will still need judgement
-
Housing officers will still need relationships
-
Community teams will still need trust.
Technology’s role is to remove friction, connect information and reduce administrative burden, so professionals can spend more time doing the work only humans can do.
The future prevention system already exists in pieces
Perhaps the most encouraging aspect of this vision is that we are not building from nothing. Many of the foundations already exist. Across healthcare, housing and local government, organisations are already using technologies that support earlier intervention, better citizen engagement and more efficient service delivery.
The challenge is that these capabilities often operate in isolation. The future prevention system already exists in pieces. What is missing is connection. This is where Netcall occupies a distinctive position.
Learning from healthcare: Liberty for Health
Within healthcare, Liberty for Health is helping NHS organisations rethink how patients, citizens and employees interact with services. Historically, healthcare transformation focused on optimising individual touchpoints – appointments, referrals, contact centres and administration.
The next stage is different. The focus shifts towards connected journeys that remove friction, understand people across multiple interactions and support proactive intervention, rather than simply managing demand. The answer increasingly lies in connecting engagement, workflow, automation and intelligence – not as separate projects, but as a single operating model.
The Rotherham case study and what it tells us
A strong example comes from Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust. In January 2026, the Trust deployed an autonomous AI agent to support IT services. Within months, IT call volumes fell by 28%, while 41% of IT queries were resolved through self-service or AI-assisted interactions.
On the surface, this is a productivity story, and an important one. The deeper lesson is that intelligent systems can now understand intent, access information, orchestrate action and resolve outcomes without requiring every scenario to be manually scripted.
If that capability can transform IT support, it can also be applied to appointment management, patient navigation, housing enquiries, benefits services, community support, discharge coordination and vulnerability assessment. The technology pattern is transferable. The opportunity is significant – though scaling a single-service pilot like this into a genuinely cross-organisational platform is a materially harder undertaking, and one that will test governance as much as technology.
Connecting the determinants of health
What makes Netcall particularly relevant to the prevention agenda is that it already operates across many of the sectors that shape population wellbeing.
In healthcare, Netcall supports NHS organisations through Liberty for Health. In housing, Tenant Hub and Rent-IQ support tenant engagement and housing management. In local government, Netcall technologies help councils improve citizen services, automate administration and streamline benefits processes.
Taken individually, these are important sector-specific successes. Viewed together, they point to something more significant: Many of the organisations responsible for the wider determinants of health are already operating on common digital foundations:
-
Housing
-
Health
-
Benefits
-
Citizen services
-
Community engagement.
The infrastructure for coordination is emerging. The challenge now is to bring it together around outcomes, rather than allowing it to remain trapped within organisational silos.
Introducing the preventative community
Imagine a community in 2035 where prevention is embedded into the way public services work.
A resident begins to experience financial difficulty. Through routine interactions, the issue is identified early. Support is coordinated across services, housing teams are alerted to potential risk, relevant welfare advice is offered, and community support options are surfaced.
Where appropriate, healthcare professionals gain visibility before the situation deteriorates. No crisis occurs. No emergency intervention is required. No single organisation carries the burden alone.
The citizen experiences one coordinated response. That is what a prevention-first society looks like: Not a world dominated by technology, but a world enabled by it.
The leadership challenge
The greatest barrier to achieving this future is not funding, technology or capability alone – though all three matter. It is leadership, and specifically the willingness to ask a different question.
Public service leaders must move beyond thinking about transformation in purely organisational terms. The question is no longer simply “How do we improve our service?” It is “How do we improve a person’s life?”
Those are fundamentally different questions. The first can reinforce silos. The second naturally drives collaboration, shared accountability and a focus on outcomes.
The organisations that thrive over the next decade will be those that embrace ecosystem thinking: Those willing to connect services around citizens rather than protect institutional boundaries, and those prepared to measure success through outcomes rather than transactions.
A prevention-first future
The strongest recent political momentum behind this shift has come from Andy Burnham, whose career – from Shadow Health Secretary, to Mayor of Greater Manchester, to Prime Minister – has consistently pushed public service reform to think beyond healthcare. But the underlying argument is bigger than any one politician, and it will need to survive changes of government to succeed.
The future of health is not solely a healthcare conversation. It is also a housing, employment, community, welfare and technology conversation. Most importantly, it is a prevention conversation.
The question facing the UK is not simply whether health and social care can be better connected. It is whether we are prepared to build a prevention-first society, where technology helps every public service work together to improve health, wellbeing and opportunity long before people reach a hospital bed.
The future prevention system will not be built by a single organisation or delivered by a single administration. It will be built by networks of organisations connected through shared ambition, intelligent technology and a commitment to putting people before institutions.
The organisations that start building those connections today will not simply improve services. They will help define the future of Britain itself.
About the author
John Clarke
Head of Client Solutions – Health
John has a wealth of experience from the health sector, having worked in the industry for over two decades. He's passionate about helping drive change in the NHS and streamlining it for both NHS professionals and patients. John aims to make a positive difference to society when it comes to the delivery of healthcare across our communities.